United States
Change Country Homepage
  • Canada
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • South Africa
  • United Kingdom
  • Member Login
  • |
  • Safety Automation Element List
  • |
  • Contact
  • |
  • COMPANY
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Key Consultants
    • Clients
    • Career Opportunities
  • SERVICES
    • Certification
    • End User
    • OEM
    • Security
    • Alarm Management
  • SOFTWARE
    • exSILentia
    • PHAx
    • SILAlarm
    • SILStat
    • SERHViewer
    • Software Support
    • All Software
  • TRAINING
    • Course Dates
    • Online Training
    • On-Site Training
    • Virtual Classroom
  • WEBINARS
    • About
    • Scheduled Webinars
    • Recordings
    • Webinar Wednesdays
  • BOOKS
  • RESOURCES
    • Safety Automation Element List
    • Features
    • Brochures / Flyers
    • White Papers
  • WEB STORE
  • BLOG

Blog - exida explains

Iwan van Beurden's photo
Iwan van Beurden
Director of Software Engineering

PHA: A must or a MUST?

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Viewed 125 times

Our thoughts and prayers are with those whose lives were lost, and those injured, as well as their families in last week’s fertilizer plant explosion in West Texas. A few statements made in the press were a bit surprising and I wanted to share those with you. Before I begin, let me be clear that I do not have detailed knowledge of the functional safety culture at the West fertilizer plant nor was anyone from exida involved in any functional safety services for this plant.

  • The plant’s June 2011 risk management plan (RMP), filed with the Environmental Protection Agency, identified several potential hazards, … The report asserted that the worst-case scenario for the plant “would be the release of…

    Continue Reading >>

    Risk Communication • (0) Comments • Permalink

wgoble's photo
Dr. William Goble, CFSE
Principal Partner

Replace Before Failure

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Viewed 1028 times

The solenoid valve manufacturer provides an FMEDA report that lists “useful life = 12 years.”  Useful life is a reliability engineering term that indicates a point in time when the failure rate of a device will begin increasing rather rapidly.  Why do we care about this time interval?  That means that any safety function equipment operated past that point in time will not achieve the designed risk reduction factor. The IEC 61511 standard states that our maintenance procedures must require that all equipment be replaced before the end of its useful life rating.  OK, there is a good reason for this.

Then we ask the maintenance supervisor to sign the purchase requisition for the new device.  First response is a…

Continue Reading >>

Risk Communication • (2) Comments • Permalink

Eric Scharpf's photo
Dr. Eric Scharpf
Principal Partner

The Safety Lifecycle as a Risk Control Loop

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Viewed 1513 times

I have been doing a number of recent projects introducing the safety lifecycle to companies that are new to the field. As a result I have been playing with various ways to think about the overall safety lifecycle philosophy. As many of the more experienced readers are aware, the overall safety lifecycle ideas are not new. But, it is worth looking at these ideas in a variety of ways to ensure we are implementing them as effectively and clearly as possible.

Today’s blog supports this goal. It presents the safety lifecycle as a basic feedback and control loop to achieve a set point value for risk as shown in the figure.

In this risk management…

Continue Reading >>

Risk Communication • (0) Comments • Permalink

Eric Scharpf's photo
Dr. Eric Scharpf
Principal Partner

Gavin Strack, CFSE

Lead Control Systems Engineer, Sinclair Knight Merz

Babies, Bathwater, and Australian Safety Laws

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Viewed 2081 times

The old saying goes, “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.” But it looks like a number of people in Australia may be in danger of doing just that with their response to the country’s newly harmonized health and safety laws.

Australia’s new Work Health and Safety Act says company officers “… must exercise due diligence to ensure that the person conducting the business or undertaking complies with that duty or obligation.” An organization also must ensure “workers and other persons should be given the highest level of protection against harm to their health, safety and welfare from hazards and risks arising from work … as is reasonably practical.”

So far, the…

Continue Reading >>

Risk Communication • (1) Comments • Permalink

wgoble's photo
Dr. William Goble, CFSE
Principal Partner

Keep Risk Personal

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Viewed 2332 times

We are fortunate that Risk Analysts have developed a logical framework of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis techniques that allow us to assess and optimally mediate risk. And we all know that this is part of the Safety Lifecycle, a series of engineering steps/procedures that represent best safety practices. These are documented in IEC 61511 for the process industries. We also know that our methods are fallible and accidents may occur.  In many ways this is what the measure of “tolerable risk” is all about.  But I think it wise to consider the personal side of risk whenever making a decision about safety.

In the typical high consequence / low frequency accident scenario, it is well known that a person…

Continue Reading >>

Risk Communication • (0) Comments • Permalink

Eric Scharpf's photo
Dr. Eric Scharpf
Principal Partner

Lifecycle Analysis: It’s Worth the Effort

Monday, April 18, 2011

Viewed 2807 times

Performing a risk analysis as part of an IEC61508/61511/ISA 84.01 safety lifecycle process can be quite challenging. How can you be sure you get what you need within budget and how can your team provide the best value for money? When these services are brought in from outside, it can be difficult to see high quality and the value of that quality in advance. But it is almost always easy to see the cost. Also the buying decision is often based on the project requirements rather than the overall life of the plant requirements. As a result, this situation can easily lead to a lower quality risk analysis. This problem is what classical economics calls “the market for lemons,” and…

Continue Reading >>

Risk Communication • (1) Comments • Permalink

wgoble's photo
Dr. William Goble, CFSE
Principal Partner

What’s the Risk?

Monday, April 04, 2011

Viewed 3551 times

As safety professionals, it is our duty to attempt to educate and explain to the public.  Perhaps the biggest challenge is to explain the concept of risk.  Many times after an accident we have heard a politician say something like “We will do whatever it takes to make sure this never happens again.”  There seems to be no analysis of risk versus cost. Sometimes resources are expended far beyond the risk, and sometimes little is done to prevent future accidents. 

The politicians and the public clearly view risk differently than safety professionals. For example, last year my company car was a Toyota Prius. I read reports and even had an email discussion with someone who had a “sudden unintended…

Continue Reading >>

Risk Communication • (0) Comments • Permalink

Blog RSS Feed

  • Click to Subscribe

Categories

  • Alarm Management (7)
  • Control System Security (10)
  • Failure Data (15)
  • Functional Safety Certification (37)
  • General (6)
  • Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) (2)
  • News (1)
  • Proof Testing (1)
  • Risk Communication (7)
  • Safety Instrumented System (1)
  • Software (9)

Most recent entries

  • The exida SchemeAdded 5 days ago
  • Root Cause AnalysisAdded 7 days ago
  • Certificate Forgery!Added 09 May 2013
  • Which Edition of IEC 61508 is Relevant to Me?Added 07 May 2013
  • How Do You Certify to IEC 61508?Added 30 April 2013
  • Practice Makes Perfect…AlmostAdded 25 April 2013
  • PHA: A must or a MUST?Added 24 April 2013
  • Setting up for FAILUREAdded 18 April 2013
  • The Human Element of Functional Safety (The Challenge)Added 10 April 2013
  • A 100% Pass Rate!Added 03 April 2013
  • Changing the PVST Interval. Hey, my Architectural Constraints changed!Added 21 March 2013
  • Changing the PVST Interval. Hey, my failure rates changed!Added 20 March 2013
  • That is impossible! It has never happened before…Added 13 March 2013
  • Define the Safety Function for a Better CertificationAdded 11 March 2013
  • So What’s an Impact Analysis?Added 06 March 2013

Contact exida

Germany +49-89-49000547
USA +1-215-453-1720
South Africa +27 31 2671564
United Kingdom +44 (0) 2476 214 794
Canada +1-403-475-1943
Mexico +52-55-1-5-18-05-73
Asia +65 6222-5160

Stay Informed

  • Get Updates Via Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Youtube Channel
  • RSS Feed of exida News

Resources

Safety Automation Element List
Blog
Features
White Papers
Company Brochures
Web Seminars

Newsletter

Receive our FREE Newsletter that goes out to over 5,000 industry professionals every month

Copyright 2000 - 2013 . exida.com LLC | Site Map