United States
Change Country Homepage
  • Canada
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • South Africa
  • United Kingdom
  • Member Login
  • |
  • Safety Automation Element List
  • |
  • Contact
  • |
  • COMPANY
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Key Consultants
    • Clients
    • Career Opportunities
  • SERVICES
    • Certification
    • End User
    • OEM
    • Security
    • Alarm Management
  • SOFTWARE
    • exSILentia
    • PHAx
    • SILAlarm
    • SILStat
    • SERHViewer
    • Software Support
    • All Software
  • TRAINING
    • Course Dates
    • Online Training
    • On-Site Training
    • Virtual Classroom
  • WEBINARS
    • About
    • Scheduled Webinars
    • Recordings
    • Webinar Wednesdays
  • BOOKS
    • Alarm Management for Process Control
    • Certified Functional Safety Expert / Professional (CFSE / CFSP) Study Guide
    • Control Systems Safety Evaluation and Reliability, 3rd Edition
    • Electrical & Mechanical Component Reliability Handbook, 3rd Edition
    • Final Elements and the IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 Functional Safety Standards
    • Functional Safety - An IEC 61508 SIL 3 Compliant Development Process, 2nd Edition
    • Practical SIL Target Selection - Risk Analysis per the IEC 61511 Safety Lifecycle
    • Safety Book Package
    • Safety Equipment Reliability Handbook - 3rd Edition
    • Safety Instrumented Systems Verification - Practical Probabilistic Calculations
  • RESOURCES
    • Safety Automation Element List
    • Features
    • Brochures / Flyers
    • White Papers
  • WEB STORE
  • BLOG

Blog - exida explains

exida : Blog : Do you have class?
tstauffer's photo
Todd Stauffer
Director of Alarm Management Services

Do you have class?

Thursday, March 08, 2012

Viewed 1687 times

Alarm Management • (0) Comments • Permalink

Are alarm classes defined in your alarm philosophy document (APD) as required by the ISA-18.2 standard? The use of classes (classification) is a new alarm management concept for many. If your APD was created before June 2009, chances are alarm classes are not defined.

Alarm classification is a method for organizing alarms based on common characteristics and requirements (e.g., testing, training, management of change, reporting).  Certainly an alarm that is identified as safeguard in a hazard and operability study (HAZOP), or as an independent protection layer (IPL)  in a LOPA will have more stringent requirements for testing and operator training than the “average” process alarm.  Classification helps to manage groups of alarms and ensure that their unique requirements are being met.

An ISA-18.2 compliant philosophy will define alarm classes, class descriptions, and associated requirements. Examples include: personnel safety, critical-to-quality, environmental protection, Safeguard, LOPA listed, etc. Alarm classes are assigned during the rationalization process, and can be assigned to one or more classes.

Information on classes can be used during many stages of the alarm management lifecycle. Analyzing alarm system performance by class can be used, for example to estimate initiating frequency for alarms that are used as IPLs. It can also pinpoint if any safety-critical alarms are being suppressed, or behaving as nuisance alarms - both indicators of a dangerous situation.

One of the contributing causes to the Deepwater Horizon accident was that the alarms designed to notify personnel of danger (fire or the presence of explosive / toxic gas) were disabled to prevent a false alarm from waking people at night. Perhaps if these alarms had been classified as personnel safety, then the proper controls would have been in place to prevent them from being disabled.

Tagged as: todd stauffer, lopa, isa-18.2, ipl, independent protection layer, hazop, apd, alarm management, alarm classification,

(0) Comments

    You Must Be Logged In To Comment

    Become a Registered Member

Blog RSS Feed

  • Click to Subscribe

Categories

  • Alarm Management (8)
  • Control System Security (10)
  • Failure Data (15)
  • Functional Safety Certification (37)
  • General (6)
  • Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) (2)
  • News (1)
  • Proof Testing (1)
  • Risk Communication (7)
  • Safety Instrumented System (1)
  • Software (9)

Most recent entries

  • How do You Compare?Added 2 hours ago
  • The exida SchemeAdded 6 days ago
  • Root Cause AnalysisAdded 14 May 2013
  • Certificate Forgery!Added 09 May 2013
  • Which Edition of IEC 61508 is Relevant to Me?Added 07 May 2013
  • Setting the PaceAdded 02 May 2013
  • How Do You Certify to IEC 61508?Added 30 April 2013
  • Practice Makes Perfect…AlmostAdded 25 April 2013
  • PHA: A must or a MUST?Added 24 April 2013
  • Setting up for FAILUREAdded 18 April 2013
  • The Human Element of Functional Safety (The Challenge)Added 10 April 2013
  • A 100% Pass Rate!Added 03 April 2013
  • Changing the PVST Interval. Hey, my Architectural Constraints changed!Added 21 March 2013
  • Changing the PVST Interval. Hey, my failure rates changed!Added 20 March 2013
  • That is impossible! It has never happened before…Added 13 March 2013

Contact exida

Germany +49-89-49000547
USA +1-215-453-1720
South Africa +27 31 2671564
United Kingdom +44 (0) 2476 214 794
Canada +1-403-475-1943
Mexico +52-55-1-5-18-05-73
Asia +65 6222-5160

Stay Informed

  • Get Updates Via Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Youtube Channel
  • RSS Feed of exida News

Resources

Safety Automation Element List
Blog
Features
White Papers
Company Brochures
Web Seminars

Newsletter

Receive our FREE Newsletter that goes out to over 5,000 industry professionals every month

Copyright 2000 - 2013 . exida.com LLC | Site Map