United States
Change Country Homepage
  • Canada
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • South Africa
  • United Kingdom
  • Member Login
  • |
  • Safety Automation Element List
  • |
  • Contact
  • |
  • COMPANY
    • About Us
    • Locations
    • Key Consultants
    • Clients
    • Career Opportunities
  • SERVICES
    • Certification
    • End User
    • OEM
    • Security
    • Alarm Management
  • SOFTWARE
    • exSILentia
    • PHAx
    • SILAlarm
    • SILStat
    • SERHViewer
    • Software Support
    • All Software
  • TRAINING
    • Course Dates
    • Online Training
    • On-Site Training
    • Virtual Classroom
  • WEBINARS
    • About
    • Scheduled Webinars
    • Recordings
    • Webinar Wednesdays
  • BOOKS
    • Alarm Management for Process Control
    • Certified Functional Safety Expert / Professional (CFSE / CFSP) Study Guide
    • Control Systems Safety Evaluation and Reliability, 3rd Edition
    • Electrical & Mechanical Component Reliability Handbook, 3rd Edition
    • Final Elements and the IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 Functional Safety Standards
    • Functional Safety - An IEC 61508 SIL 3 Compliant Development Process, 2nd Edition
    • Practical SIL Target Selection - Risk Analysis per the IEC 61511 Safety Lifecycle
    • Safety Book Package
    • Safety Equipment Reliability Handbook - 3rd Edition
    • Safety Instrumented Systems Verification - Practical Probabilistic Calculations
  • RESOURCES
    • Safety Automation Element List
    • Features
    • Brochures / Flyers
    • White Papers
  • WEB STORE
  • BLOG

Blog - exida explains

exida : Blog : We’re Only Human
John Yozalinas's photo
John Yozalinas
Senior Safety Engineer

We’re Only Human

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Viewed 1475 times

Functional Safety Certification • (0) Comments • Permalink

We’re only human.  Most of the time, that is a good thing.  But humans seem to accept more risk over time when nothing bad has happened.  We lose our vigilance.  We take more chances.  A close call might only be remembered as an unusually rare anomaly instead of a call to action. 

I was on a flight from PHL to PHX recently.  The flight had taken off late for a number of reasons.  The pilot tried to keep passengers informed about the estimated arrival time because many folks had tight connecting flights.  I got the sense that the pilot was very intent to arrive as soon as possible.  As we finally approached the landing strip, our wheels no sooner touched the ground when the engines revved up and we were heading back up into the sky.  As the pilot later revealed, there was a large plane crossing our runway.  Had we continued to land, there could have been a collision.  Thank goodness the pilot’s attention to detail and following the process were not overruled by complacency of having landed a plane many times before and the distraction to get passengers to their connecting flights.

We might draw a parallel to the process industry.  There may be many safeguards in place to keep the work site safe, but there is often still a reliance on operator reaction to an alarm where distraction or complacency can lead to trouble.  Keep the human intervention as simple and non-tedious as possible.  It is not always possible to automate all parts of an operation.  Sometimes we need a person to hit the emergency button to avoid catastrophe. 

We’re creatures of habit; we take risks and begin to think that risk goes down because we’ve done something over and over again without mishap.  Don’t get complacent when it comes to safety!

Tagged as: john yozalinas,

(0) Comments

    You Must Be Logged In To Comment

    Become a Registered Member

Blog RSS Feed

  • Click to Subscribe

Categories

  • Alarm Management (7)
  • Control System Security (10)
  • Failure Data (15)
  • Functional Safety Certification (37)
  • General (6)
  • Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) (2)
  • News (1)
  • Proof Testing (1)
  • Risk Communication (7)
  • Safety Instrumented System (1)
  • Software (9)

Most recent entries

  • The exida SchemeAdded 5 days ago
  • Root Cause AnalysisAdded 14 May 2013
  • Certificate Forgery!Added 09 May 2013
  • Which Edition of IEC 61508 is Relevant to Me?Added 07 May 2013
  • Setting the PaceAdded 02 May 2013
  • How Do You Certify to IEC 61508?Added 30 April 2013
  • Practice Makes Perfect…AlmostAdded 25 April 2013
  • PHA: A must or a MUST?Added 24 April 2013
  • Setting up for FAILUREAdded 18 April 2013
  • The Human Element of Functional Safety (The Challenge)Added 10 April 2013
  • A 100% Pass Rate!Added 03 April 2013
  • Changing the PVST Interval. Hey, my Architectural Constraints changed!Added 21 March 2013
  • Changing the PVST Interval. Hey, my failure rates changed!Added 20 March 2013
  • That is impossible! It has never happened before…Added 13 March 2013
  • Define the Safety Function for a Better CertificationAdded 11 March 2013

Contact exida

Germany +49-89-49000547
USA +1-215-453-1720
South Africa +27 31 2671564
United Kingdom +44 (0) 2476 214 794
Canada +1-403-475-1943
Mexico +52-55-1-5-18-05-73
Asia +65 6222-5160

Stay Informed

  • Get Updates Via Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Youtube Channel
  • RSS Feed of exida News

Resources

Safety Automation Element List
Blog
Features
White Papers
Company Brochures
Web Seminars

Newsletter

Receive our FREE Newsletter that goes out to over 5,000 industry professionals every month

Copyright 2000 - 2013 . exida.com LLC | Site Map