Oh look! Squirrel! I am not much of a blogger. I should be but I’m not. This is strange, because I always have plenty to say. This subject just gets me going so I am writing about it. I welcome feedback and opinions. I have been in cybersecurity in one…
Functional Safety Assessments (FSA) focus on the relevant functional safety standards that are to be applied to a product in the appropriate industry. These are standards such as IEC 61511 in the process automation industry, or ISO 26262 in the automotive industry. And IEC 61508 is like an umbrella safety…
This webinar first describes the distinction between failure rate prediction and estimation methods in general. We will then discuss details about the procedures used to obtain generic failure rates for certain mechanical equipment using FMEDA predictions and OREDA estimations along with other methods used in industry today. The results of the two methods when applied to a number of specific equipment items are compared and, when differences in the results exist between the two methods, plausible explanations for differences are provided. Equipment examples include a representative of topside equipment items and representative subsea equipment items. The relative merits of each method are discussed along with comparisons to industry databases and field studies. Finally we will discuss what is a realistic failure rate for mechanical devices, and what to do if you find yourself looking at unrealistic numbers.
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
Safety deviation is a term used in functional safety. Safety deviation (formerly safety accuracy) is the change in output due to (internal) component failures not analyzed in a Failure Modes, Effects, & Diagnostic Analysis (FMEDA). Safety accuracy is an input to the FMEDA analyst to advise the level of analysis…
Let me ask you a few questions: Does adding letters after a person’s name make them more important? What did that person go through to achieve those letters? If someone has XYZ after their name and another person also has XYZ after their name, are they equal? Did one of…
Safety deviation (formerly safety accuracy) is the change in output due to (internal) component failures not analyzed in a Failure Modes, Effects, & Diagnostic Analysis (FMEDA). Safety accuracy is an input to the FMEDA analyst to advise the level of analysis detail for critical analog components.
Some time ago, I was involved with embedded software projects using microprocessors that had limited memory, speed, and I/O resources. All embedded programming was in assembly code. All memory variables were global; it was too hard to keep track of stack variables. The hardware design assumed that any technical problems…
Cybersecurity is rapidly becoming something the process safety can no longer ignore. It is part of the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS). In addition, the President’s Executive Order 13636– “Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity,” has drawn attention to the need for addressing cybersecurity in our plants as it has been demonstrated…
exida, the world’s foremost technical authority and certification agency, is pleased to announce its 2015 exida Safety Awards. The awards are meant to honor the most outstanding functional safety or cybersecurity products certified by exida per IEC 61508/IEC 62443 in the following categories: Components Final Elements Logic Solvers Sensors Software…
Over the course of several blogs , I talked about getting realistic failure rate data, where this failure data comes from, and how different methods of failure data analysis compare. I think if you understand this, you will begin to get a very good feel of what it takes to…
There are organizations that are small enough to follow an informal or even undocumented process and still produce a product of sufficient quality to meet market needs. When these organizations attempt to develop a safety product, they inevitably fall short of meeting the requirements of IEC 61508. A formalized process…
As more industries, customers, and regulatory bodies are requiring the adherence to the functional safety standards, the need for failure information for instruments and devices is increasing. Unfortunately with this increased demand there has been an increase in the number of self-certifications and third party certifications that provide failure information that is outside typical industry norms and leads to serious under design of safety functions. This webinar will review the sources of data and provide practical guidance on how to determine if the data you have would pass the “red face” test.
exida, a global supplier of functional safety products, services, and certifications has released their Safety Equipment Reliability Handbook (SERH) – 4th Edition, a hard copy of the SERH database with a vast amount of equipment item reliability data. The SERH database provides a collection of failure rate data that is…
exida, a global supplier of functional safety products, services and certifications is pleased to announce a business partnership with Vista Automacao. “Vista Automacao is a service company that strives to provide exceptional services, adding value to the end user in a field where there are few truly qualified players,” says…
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
Over the course of several blogs , I will talk about getting realistic failure rate data, where this failure data comes from, and how different methods of failure data analysis compare. I think if you understand this, you will begin to get a very good feel of what it takes…
The exida course “Alarm Rationalization with SILAlarm” is scheduled to be held on September 9-10, 2015 in Calgary, AB Canada. Attendees will learn how to conduct alarm rationalization of greenfield (new) or brownfield (existing) applications in order to optimize performance of their alarm systems. The class immerses participants in discussion…
This webinar will introduce and discuss the exida Automation Cybersecurity (ACS) program. This is a certificate program that addresses a growing need to provide confirmation that an attendee showed competency by retaining the knowledge presented in a training course. The ACS program will also provide an analysis of where the candidate’s strengths and weaknesses lie. This program will also help a participant judge their competency level if interested in obtaining a certification like the Certified Automation Cybersecurity Expert (CACE) or Certified Automation Cybersecurity Specialist (CACS).