In this webinar, we examine Bespoke Systems and discuss the application of standard IEC 61511 in this context. We will explore how to select the appropriate standard, implement an assessment project effectively while minimizing errors and rework. The market for functional safety standards is expanding, with significant adoption across various countries and industries. In some regions, compliance with standard IEC 61511 is mandatory for equipment such as turbines to obtain operational approval. Consequently, organizations must demonstrate that their deployed systems effectively manage risks. Safety professionals involved in these operations must be capable of executing projects efficiently. These standards facilitate communication across different industries and applications, which is beneficial in this context. We also explore various verification and validation methods commonly employed, assessing their coverage of the safety lifecycle.
ISO 26262 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
ISO 26262 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508, ISO 13849 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
ISASecure SDLA in the Security Automation Equipment List
ISO 21448 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
EN 50128 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
With the growing cybersecurity requests to product and service providers, selecting the right standards for developing a security program has never been more critical. But considering the time involved with developing this program, organizations don’t want to pick just any standard, it is important to select the standard that is best aligned with the field the organization is working in, its goals, and its organizational needs. Two standards that are often referenced in industrial and building cybersecurity are NIST 800-53 and IEC 62443. This webinar will provide an overview of both standards, a comparison of the two standards, as well as the benefits and potential shortcomings for each, so that you can be confident on the best path forward for your organization.
ISO 26262 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
After many years of experience at exida, we still see FMEDA projects going overbudget with schedule delay. The main reason is often lack of needed information needed to finish the FMDA task. We started using the functional FMEDA approach some years ago as that method deals with changes, updates, and new designs much better than the old direct approach. However, to really get things done on budget and on schedule we started using an information tool, ARCHx. This information can be gathered as part of a modified DFMEA which we call DDMA but can also be done independently. This webinar describes the functional FMEDA approach, lists the information needed to do this type of FMEDA, and shows how that information can be optimally gathered / documented.
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
Threat Modeling (TM) is a process for identifying and prioritizing potential cybersecurity threats to software, hardware or a system. Contributing to the high value of TM is: The ability to identify threats early in the design process when they are less expensive to address Methodically prioritizing threats helps focus mitigation…
I have been asked this question many times by various clients over the years. This comes down to whether a perfect proof test is assumed or not. Let us remember that Mission Time is defined as the amount of time we expect a set of SIF equipment to run until a major overhaul is required, usually based upon the useful life of the devices. This time is set by the end user. Some companies are still not appreciating how greatly they will overstate the risk reduction of the Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) by assuming perfect proof testing since Mission Time then has no impact.
Therefore, what is perfect proof testing and what does this mean? We will discuss this among other things in this webinar.
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
Has your FMEA entered the realm of the paperwork exercise that we force ourselves to do for no real reason than someone says we must do it? I have enjoyed analysis using FMEA. I first learned it existed when I was working for Ford. FMEA was the first Ford Technical…
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List