exida - Functional Safety Services, IACS Cybersecurity, Alarm Management, IEC 61508 Certification

Search

20 results for the keyword search: ""

JinkoSolar U.S. Inc. - BESS SunTera/DCB Series System Integration and Maintenance Process

IEC 62443 in the Security Automation Equipment List


Arm Technology (China) Co., Ltd. - SHANHAI-S30FP TrustEngine (TE-900) Software Test Library (STL)

ISO 26262 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


Lear Corporation - ISO/SAE 21434 CSMS

ISO/SAE 21434 in the Security Automation Equipment List


Sandisk Technologies, Inc. - Automotive Cybersecurity Management System

ISO/SAE 21434 in the Security Automation Equipment List


White Paper: Design Tradeoffs for SIL2 Rated Control Knobs:  A Comparative FMEDA of Sensing Technologies

This paper provides a comparative analysis of rotary control interface designs for industrial products requiring SIL2 certification under the IEC 61508 standard. Recognizing that even a simple panel knob constitutes a critical safety function, we evaluate the reliability and diagnostic coverage of three primary sensing technologies: potentiometers, multi-position rotary switches,…


Arm Ltd - Arm CoreLink MMU-720AE

IEC 61508, ISO 26262 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


Combet Valve BV Houten - CB Series Ball Valves

IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


KROHNE Messtechnik GmbH - H250/.././M40./../.../K1(2)-..-SK and H250/.././M40./../ESK/..-..-SE

IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


Recorded Webinars: Threat Modeling for Medical Devices: Practical Steps for Stronger Cybersecurity

The increasing connectivity of medical devices introduces new challenges for manufacturers and operators: cybersecurity issues can compromise not only data privacy but also patient safety. This webinar demonstrates how structured threat modeling can help teams systematically identify, understand, and mitigate cybersecurity risks throughout the medical device lifecycle.

We will walk through the steps of a threat-modeling workflow to illustrate how threats can be identified early, refined as the system architecture evolves, and linked to risk-reduction measures. The session highlights how threat modeling aligns with common risk-management practices in functional safety and cybersecurity, and how it can be integrated into a Secure Development Lifecycle (SDLC).

Participants will learn how focused threat analysis supports compliance with key regulatory requirements and strengthens the overall security posture of connected medical devices.

What You Will Learn

  • Why threat modeling is essential for modern connected medical devices
  • How to apply a threat-modeling workflow
  • Practical techniques to identify and structure cyber threats at the system level
  • How threat modeling connects to existing risk-management activities
  • Common pitfalls and best practices for teams new to medical device threat modeling

Who Should Attend

  • Medical device software engineers, system engineers, and architects
  • Risk management and quality professionals
  • Cybersecurity engineers focused on medical or transitioning into the domain
  • R&D managers, technical leads, and project managers seeking better cybersecurity integration
     


Recorded Webinars: exSILentia 4.15.1 New Feature Spotlight: Custom Checklists and Enhanced Cyber Risk Assessment

This exSILentia Feature Spotlight highlights the key updates in version 4.15.1, focusing on expanded flexibility, language support, and enhanced cybersecurity modules. The most significant new feature is the introduction of User-Defined Checklists, allowing users to create custom templates for any module within the safety or cybersecurity lifecycle (e.g., PHA, LOPA) and link them across different project tasks. Additionally, the application now supports French and Spanish languages. 

For cybersecurity, the risk assessment function has been separated into two distinct modules: the High-Level Risk Assessment (HLRA) and the Detailed Level Risk Assessment (DLRA) (previously a single Cyber PHA module), providing a clearer workflow and the ability to differentiate between hackable and non-hackable countermeasures, thereby improving the rigor and structure of the cyber safety analysis.


Recorded Webinars: From Standards to Scenarios: Conducting Effective OT Cybersecurity Risk Assessments

Effective loss prevention requires identifying risks in both process safety and cybersecurity. OT cybersecurity risk assessments follow standards/guidance like IEC 62443-3-2, and UK HSE’s OG-0086 with Process Safety handled by mostly by IEC 61511. For organizations adhering to IEC 61511, it is a requirement under Clause 8.2.4 to perform a security risk assessment, while in parallel, OG-0086 requires evaluating cyber resilience in Major Accident Hazard scenarios and Loss of Essential Services. Methodologies vary, but all must address worst-case consequences, threat likelihood, and control effectiveness. A sound assessment ensures regulatory compliance, aligns with best practices, and supports informed risk management decisions.

Join Dwane Shelton in this Webinar as he goes through the specific parts of IEC 62443 involved in Risk Assessments as well and interconnectivity with the HSE’s UK OG-0086

Key Takeaways:

  • What are the standards and guidelines telling us?
  • What is actually happening in industry?
  • The Security Risk Equation and the likelihood of a successful attack
  • Practical example of a High and Detailed level Risk Assessment inline with IEC 62443-3-2 and UK OG-0086


TE CONNECTIVITY BRASIL INDUSTRIA DE ELETRONICOS LTDA - Valve Control and Monitoring System

IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


White Paper: Using Human Factors to Improve Cybersecurity

Managing human factors is a cornerstone of process safety, essential for preventing incidents that threaten personnel, the environment, and operational uptime. As Industrial Control System 〈ICS〉 cybersecurity threats escalate, applying these established human performance principles to cyber hygiene has become a critical necessity. Data suggests that the human element remains…


White Paper: Securing Automated Safeguards from Cyberattack

Process plants rely on multiple independent layers of protection to mitigate operational risks. These safeguards typically range from mechanical devices, such as pressure relief valves, to automated systems including basic process control system 〈BPCS〉 interlocks, alarms, and safety instrumented functions (SIF). While traditional safety risk assessments assume these layers function…


ARM Limited - ARM SI-Salus ISO/SAE 21434

ISO/SAE 21434 in the Security Automation Equipment List


MSA - The Safety Company - S5000 Fixed Gas Monitor

IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


Dresser, LLC - Masoneilan 75000 Series Limit Control Valve

IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


KSB S.A.S. - AMTROBOX switchbox, AMTRONIC A1300 and A1301

, IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


KSB S.A.S. - DANAIS, ISORIA 10,16,20, 25 MAMMOUTH KE Elastomer, KE Plastomer OXYRIA

, IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


Horizon Journey (Shanghai) Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing Horizon Robotics Technology Research and Development Co., Ltd. - ISO/PAS 8800 Development Process

ISO/PAS 8800 in the Safety Automation Equipment List


Page 3 of 146 pages.  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  Last ›