This whitepaper explores the critical role of the electrolytic capacitor as the “weakest link” in a product's useful life. It details how environmental factors, specifically thermal and voltage impacts, can significantly reduce a capacitor's longevity. By applying appropriate derating techniques, designers can mitigate these effects and extend the product's useful…
Welcome to your essential guide to functional safety, tailored specifically for product developers. In a world where technology is increasingly integrated into every aspect of our lives—from industrial robots to autonomous vehicles—the potential for harm from product malfunctions makes functional safety not just important, but critical.
This webinar cuts through the complexity to provide a clear understanding of what functional safety truly entails and why it's critical for product success. We'll start by defining functional safety not by its often-confusing official terms, but as a structured methodology for managing risk through defined engineering processes, essential product design requirements, and probabilistic analysis. The “north star” goals? To ensure your product not only works reliably but, if it does fail, it does so in a safe and predictable manner.
We'll dive into two fundamental concepts: the Safety Lifecycle, a detailed engineering process focused on design quality to minimize systematic failures, and Probabilistic, Performance-Based Design using reliability metrics to minimize random hardware failures. You'll learn about IEC 61508, the foundational standard for functional safety, and how numerous industry-specific standards derive from it.
The webinar will walk you through the Engineering Design phases: analyzing hazards and required risk reduction, realizing optimal designs, and ensuring safe operation. We'll demystify the Performance Concept and the critical Safety Integrity Level (SIL), explaining its definition, criteria (systematic capability, architectural constraints, PFD), and how it relates to industry-specific priorities.
Discover key Design Verification techniques like DFMEA/DDMA and FMEDA, emphasizing how these tools help identify and address problems early in development. We'll detail the FMEDA technique showing how design decisions directly impact predictions like safe and dangerous failure rates, diagnostic coverage, and useful life. Finally, we'll cover Functional Safety Certification, explaining its purpose, process, and what adjustments to your development process can set you up for success.
Sellersvile, PA - exida is excited to announce that Dr. Molly O’Brien, part of a team of experts developing a certification scheme for Safety Functions that include Machine Learning (ML), will deliver a keynote presentation at the European Space Agency's (ESA) Software Product Assurance Conference . The event, which brings…
For A Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) to achieve its target SIL, the IEC61511 standard requires that it meets three design requirements: PFDavg/PFH, Architectural Constraints and Systematic Capability. Many people consider meeting the PFDavg/PFH target sufficient, but this is not the case. A SIF is an Independent Protection Layer (IPL), which is required to satisfy 4 requirements:
S – must be specifically designed to prevent the consequence of the hazardous event
I – must be completely Independent from all other IPLs
D – must be designed to have sufficient defense against random and systematic failures
A – must be auditable in terms of being able to be tested and maintained
Therefore, meeting the random hardware failure dependability is the PFDavg/PFH and meeting the systematic failure dependability is the Systematic capability. The architectural constraint requirement is required to counteract any unrealist parameters used in the PFDavg/PFH calculations and determines the level of Hardware Fault Tolerance (HFT) required. The webinar examines what’s involved with determining the PFDavg/PFH and the 9 key variables associated with this, as well as the importance of tracking Useful Life, and how to determine the HFT using the tables in IEC61508 or the table in IEC61511. It also looks at equipment qualification for the SIF and the use of IEC61508 certified devices or Prior Use justification to meet the systematic requirements.
What you will learn?
Who should attend?
This is a question I’ve been asked many times, with some stating that as long as the PFDavg (or PFH) meets the target SIL then that’s fine. Whereas this statement is partially true, it is not the full answer. IEC61511 defines the criteria for meeting the requirements of an Independent…
SELLERSVILLE, PA — exida, a global leader in functional safety, cybersecurity, and alarm management, is pleased to announce the appointment of Richard (Richie) Butler as the new Country Manager for the UK and Ireland. Born and raised in the south of the county but currently residing in North Tipperary, Ireland,…
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
IEC 61508 in the Safety Automation Equipment List
This webinar offers an in-depth exploration of the NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) standards, the enforceable cybersecurity framework for the power industry across the U.S. and parts of Canada. We'll break down the structure of these standards and their applicability, including the criticality tiers (Low, Medium, and High) that determine the required level of protection for a site based on its potential impact on the power grid.
You'll gain a clear understanding of the key requirements of NERC CIP and how they compare to the IEC 62443 cybersecurity standards, highlighting areas of alignment and key differences. Most importantly, we'll discuss the valuable takeaways from NERC CIP—not just for regulated power sites but also for other industries looking to enhance their own cybersecurity posture. Join us to learn how to apply these powerful insights to protect critical infrastructure.
In today’s world, having your Operation and Maintenance (O&M) data in a digital format allows for increased accessibility and traceability. Using more traditional recordings, such as on paper or with various Excel notebooks, increases the chances of error or loss of data. These methods also make it difficult to analyze…
¿Cómo sabemos cuál es el modo de operación de una SIF? Mucha gente en la industria de proceso asume que la SIF operará en baja demanda, lo cual no siempre es así, pudiendo traer como resultado que la SIF diseñada tenga un desempeño pobre en seguridad, y por lo tanto, un incremento en el riesgo del proceso.
Introduction: The European Union’s Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) is set to introduce mandatory cybersecurity requirements for “products with digital elements” , including those used in Industrial Control Systems (ICS) and Operational Technology (OT) environments. This regulation, slated for enforcement beginning December 2027 , aims to enhance cybersecurity across supply chains…
ISASecure in the Security Automation Equipment List
ISO/SAE 21434 in the Security Automation Equipment List
ISASecure in the Security Automation Equipment List
Este estudio analiza los aspectos clave que conforman un sistema de seguridad funcional eficaz, de acuerdo con normas como IEC 61508 e IEC 61511. Los elementos más relevantes incluyen la identificación de las funciones instrumentadas de seguridad (SIF), la determinación del nivel de integridad de seguridad (SIL) y el diseño…
This whitepaper analyzes the key aspects of an effective functional safety system, from safety lifecycle management and risk analysis to the design of Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) , in accordance with IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 . By addressing these elements, this systematic approach reduces operational risks and enhances the…